Sat 29 Aug 09 Newmarket

Newmarket 5-05

Lord Theo 2 9/2
William Blake 5 7
Falcon Rock 7 9/2
Bullet Man 13 6
Moheeb 14 9
Cheshire Prince 15 14 bet 16 early 10/11 20/1

An interesting race with distance doubts and recent form issues for several. Effectively no value, possibly Cheshire Prince at Betfred’s 20/1. Certainly I am in no rush to get on here.
——————————————
I have backed Cheshire Prince. He was marginal value at 20/1 but I missed that – Betfred had shortened to 14/1 so I took 16/1 at Totesport. What swayed the issue was the fact that his trainer has won this before and the ‘trend’ sp has been up to 28/1. Marginal arguments but enough to shorten my price by a couple of points had I looked at those factors initially. The fact that Betfred’s offer had been taken suggests there are others sniffing around to pick up what little value there is. That said, I could have had 20s had I got a move on this morning.
—————————————–
10th of 11 at 20/1; ‘led 2f remained prominent, driven over 3f out, soon weakened opened 16/1 touched 20/1′.

1 Lord Theo 4/1
2 Falcon Rock 7/2 f
3 William Blake 9/2
4 Ellemujie 16/1

Fri 28 Aug 09 Newmarket

Newmarket 4-05

Recession Proof 7/2 11/4
Merchant of Dubai 5 9/4
Cyborg 5 5
Rugell 7 16 bet 16 early 3rd 20/1
Tungsten Strike 9 9
Trip The Light 12 11/2

Doubts about the distance for several of these but I go with Rugell at 16/1 as value; H Cecil is in very good form, 5 from 27 last 2 weeks. Rugell is lightly raced and that is also a plus.
——————————————–
Close. Recession Proof and Merchant of Dubai deadheated first with Rugell third. With 5f to go, it looked as if Rugell might keep the lead, having tracked the leader to that point; the others certainly had to work hard. The improvement-for-new-distance hunch was correct and I noticed that Cecil has won this previously so presumably he knew what he was doing. A good bet.

OK, so here’s the plan….

By way of summary, this has been a good year. Moneywise, of course, a loss but things have become clear in this first season back after a break of several years and I am very optimistic for the future.

I have complete confidence in the Form Value approach and have got it to a nice balance of time, effort and reward. Some good bets have been made and a couple of winners missed simply through taking my eyes off the ball with Sesenta at 33/1 and Balcarce Nov at 66/1. Those are recent, after a month’s break looking at the Fineform ’system’, which took a little of my sharpness away. Previously, both the Flat and Jumps have been promising, notably Lord Jay Jay at Aintree, 2nd, 50/1 taken. I won’t go on about the Grand National :-) Overall, my form reading has become fairly sophisticated.

So, now for business – here’s the plan:

Form Value, using my own modification of the formula. There is no comparable alternative and I will be forever in Mark Coton’s debt for his marvellous book.

Non-contenders are ruled out (before prices are calculated) and anything left is backable. The rule is to go for the longest-priced contender which is value (the ‘fine tuning’ of percentage differences doesn’t deliver in practice, whatever it’s apparent logic.) Bookies prices are ignored as far as assessment goes – I don’t believe they have any special information or ability.

Contrarian thinking is given it’s proper weight in the assessment. Oasis Knight’s headgear note was spot on and a good example.

One race a day, big meetings and big fields preferred. 7f to 1m 4f ideally, class 3 and above, handicaps. Generally, don’t try to account too much for the draw – it’s an added complication which can undermine form reading.

Win singles primarily but an eye open for value forecasts ( = at least one horse in the forecast must be value). If two races are ever looked at, consider a win double to multiply value.

That’s it then. Still a few weeks to go of the Flat and I will count it as a success regardless of the profits, it being a return after a break and taking a while to find the right ‘mix’. I have that now so let’s see what happens. It’s fascinating in any event and I am happy to count myself among the enthusiasts of this sport. I’m inclined to think that value bettors are a rather classy bunch :-)

Sat 22 Aug 09

Sandown 3-15

Fanjura 4 7
Australia Day 9 14 NR
Lang Shining 10 7
Supaseus 11 20 bet 20 early
Eastern Aria 11 8
Hillview Boy 11 12

Supaseus clearly the bet.
———————————-
Australia day is a non-runner so a new book. I took 20/1 about Supaseus so expect a Rule 4. He is now 16/1 so little interest during the morning.
———————————-

1st Fanjura 11/2
2nd Antinori 8/1
3rd Greylami 10/1
4th Eastern Aria 8/1
5th Supaseus 12/1

Supaseus ran well, tracking the eventual winner but unable to keep up in the final furlong. A good bet at 20/1. He was backed on course, opening 16/1, touched 10/1, sp 12/1.

Fri 21 Aug 09 Sandown

Sandown 3-50

Romany Princess 5/2 8
Marajaa 6 9
Ellemujie 7 12 bet 14 early
Gold Express 8 7
Resurge 12 9

————————–
1st Bab Al Salam 9-2 JF
2nd Isphahan 16-1
3rd Light From Mars 7-1
————————–

Ellemujie is value at 14/1 early. A course winner off just 2lbs lower a couple of months ago, he has run in a higher class twice subsequently, both less than optimal draws and made an ‘ambitious run up inner’ last time out at quirky Goodwood. Today is a drop in class, conditions suit and trainer D K Ivory is 2 from 10 in the last fortnight. 14/1 is over-priced at Corals.

———————————–

Beat SP nicely but poor run. I would say the draw was a major factor in that – caught behind, against the rails, no chance to get through the crowd. Some slight effort it seems but then eased in final furlong – one for later.

I had ruled out all of the first three home, Bab Al Salam with some hesitation – note to self, his trainer is good and on form.

Discussions with a friend today about the market getting closer to ‘my’ odds, in other words, the effect of more information making punters more effective and value harder to find. I blame Nick Mordin.

Thu 20 Aug 09 York

York 2-50

Acrostic 6 11/2
Mirrored 13/2 5
Captain Brilliance 7 10 (12 Betfred)
Lovelace 9 10
Alfathaa 9 16 (20 Betfred)
Mia’s Boy 10 14
Flipando 11 20 bet 20 early
Webbow 12 11
Roaring Forte 13 10

I had Acrostic marked as one to watch out for but so did everyone else it seems :-) Otherwise, Flipando doesn’t appeal (famous last words) and that leaves Alfatthaa at 20/1, if I can get to Betfred’s in time. Mia’s Boy and Captain Brilliance are value as well.

I am happy to leave the form behind once the prices are calculated – it should be purely a numbers game from that point. Alfathaa is the bet if I can get that price.
————————————
Nope, missed it so, against my better judgement, I have backed Flipando. I am sure he has let me down in the past, one of those horses who promise but never quite deliver. Good points? Topspeed top rated and trainer in good form. Otherwise, this is hope over experience.
————————————
Well, walked into that with my eyes open – Flipando truly did not deliver. Roaring Forte won, Acrostic 3rd.

Wed 19 Aug 09 York Ebor

York 3-25

Warmingah 7/2 9
Hits Only Vic 9 16 bet 16 early 3rd 16/1
Changeingtheguard 3 9/4
Red Merlin 12 7
Precision Break 13 10
Magicalmysterytour 16 16
Manyriverstocross 20 11
Desert Sea 20 16
Deutschland 22 20
Sesenta 24 33

The only value horses here are Warmingah and Hits Only Vic. Magicalmysterytour was 25s this morning but only 16s now. Again, the paucity of value seems suspicious.

That said, those two are my most likely winners anyway so possible betting material. Hits Only Vic is the ‘longest priced value’ qualifier.
——————————————–
Hits Only Vic ran well enough and I am happy with the bet. However, I took Sesenta’s price (24/1 in the morning, then 33/1 later before the off) as only marginally better than my odds and so ignored the ‘numbers’ bet – he came 1st at 25/1. Again, it might be that one has to back any contender if the offered price is bigger and not go in for notions of a ‘cut off’ point. There was only 1% diffence in the probabilities between 24/1 and 33/1 but somehow that doesn’t count in practice. What is going on, I don’t know, but from now I will go with the price regardless of the ‘true’ odds.

Tue 18 Aug 09 York Ebor Meeting

York 4-40

William Blake 8 8 bet 8 early 11/17 7/1
Laterly 10 8
Dona Alba 11 20
Yurgonnabelucky 11 10
Royal destination 12 3f
Matrash 18 10
Mul of Killough 22 NR

York 4.40
1st 5 Royal Destination 5-2 F
2nd 11 Stevie Thunder 33-1
3rd 6 Moheebb 20-1
4th 1 Dream Lodge 16-1

I fancy William Blake here but Dona Alba is the win single value at almost twice my estimated odds.
——————————–
I backed William Blake who didn’t deliver. The stake was split to do a forecast, W Blake to beat Dona Alba. She ran well enough, coming 5/17 at 11/1, 20/1 being available in the morning. A tricky race with none of my rated horses in the frame.

Sat 15 Aug 09

Newbury 3-45

Cyflymder 6/4 7/2
Swift Gift 7/2 7/2
Classic Descent 12 14 bet 16/1 early
Saucy Brown 14 8
Masai Moon 16 14

These are Ladbrokes prices first thing, Corals not being up at that time.

My first reaction was that this is another ‘no value’ race with both market leaders strong on conventional factors. I might have taken Dave Nevison’s comment to heart somewhat, that value is harder to get since Betfair’s ‘hive mind’ is too accurate for dicrepancies and I was going to give it a miss but then thought contrarian thinking might thrive in such an environment where conventional assessment is ineffective and started looking again at the ones who had hinted at something during the assessment.

Masai Moon seemed of interest, backed to win in it’s run before last (it didn’t) and upped in class last time out. The forecast prices suggested marginal value.

This was before I checked the actual odds on offer and saw 4 points difference at BetFred about Classic descent: 16/1 when I go 11/1. There is a possible fitness issue, 59 days since a run, and he has only won a maiden last year.

On the plus side though, he is lightly raced, just 7 runs in all as a 4 year old. Two of those this season, an understandable 9/11 first time out then 6/9 on the all-weather, a surface which either suits or not. In other words, these runs are not as bad as they look. Furthermore, Topspeed has him top rated on a run at Doncaster last year and the trainer P J Makin is not only 4 wins from 13 runs in the last 2 weeks (= approx 28%) but has won this previously. Other trends also fit well, favourites being just 1 from 10 in the last decade, with winners up to 25/1.

I have felt confident often enough in the past only to see the horse disappear without a trace, nevertheless this looks good and I was happy to take Fred’s 16/1 offer, with the ‘best odds’ guarantee. Will this be a triumph for contrarian thinking? (cue theme from ‘Jaws’….)
———————————–
After all that, Classic descent is a non-runner! That makes Masai Moon marginally better off but I am inclined to pass.

Fri 14 Aug 09

Newbury 2-55

Strathcal 3 5
Toujours Souriante 7/2 6
Zaaqya 8 6
Oasis Knight 11 8 Won 8/1
Takafu 13 14 bet 14 early 8/12 10/1 Bureaucrat 22 14
It’s a Date 22 9

50/1 bar

Funny looking race. Several have never won over this distance (1m 5 1/2f), with the 3 year olds looking good. Oasis Knight wears visor for the first time, normally a negative, but there is a note after his win last year that his succesful half-brother also needed headgear and I see that as siginficant. However, after yesterday’s short-priced loser I am wary of going for the ‘obvious’ choices here (Strathcal, Toujours Souriante) and have had a small bet on Takafu. He is a measly 14/1 at Ladbrokes which is annoying as elasewhere (i.e. not in this neck of the woods) he is 25s! There should be a law against it and so I am left with scraping some small edge. The small bet allows me to have more on at board prices, if I can be arsed. 25/1 would definitely be acceptable. He has the top ratings and a good weight compared to his previous winning mark. Distance and going are fine.

Of course, a forecast beckons but I am going cautiously for now after a month away from this approach. In fact, it is as much for the pleasure of the numbers as any attempt to get rich (though that follows naturally) and I am happy with just one or two races a day and to see the method develop. I will also being looking at doing correlation tests on the various sets of odds.
———————————————-
Oasis Knight won this easily at 8/1. My comment about the visor proved more significant than I realised! Takafu looked to be going well, tracking the leader nicely until the home straight when he gradually sank back into the field. Interestingly, he was backed from 16s down to 10/1. I did have a bit more on but with the Tote.

Contrarian thinking would have paid off here and it is a reminder that just one factor may merit a high score in contrast to an accumulation of more obvious elements.

An interesting race!

« Older entries